SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46961

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
LT. COL. RAVNEET(RETD.) VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
W.P.(C) 19580/2025



##PAGE1##

$~26

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 19580/2025, CM APPL. 81828/2025 and CM APPL.

81829/2025

SI/PHARM PURN SINGH .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Adv.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents

Through: Ms. Neha Rastogi, SPC, Mr.

Animesh Rastogi, Mr. Rajat Dubey, Advs.

with Ms. Bhavana Bajaj, GP

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

O R D E R

% 23.12.2025

CM APPL. 81829/2025 (for lengthy synopsis

1. For the reasons stated in the application, the lengthy synopsis

are permitted to be taken on record.

2. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 19580/2025 and CM APPL. 81828/2025 (stay)

3. The petitioner is holding the post of SI (Pharma). He has been

transferred from Delhi to Guwahati on 5 December 2025. He assails

the said transfer.

4. In the writ petition, the petitioner has pointed out that his wife is

W.P.(C)19580/2025 Page1of

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 05:01:16

##PAGE2##

suffering from anxiety neurosis, of his two daughters, one is suffering

from seizure disorder and epilepsy and both the daughters are in their

12th class academic session.

5. The petitioner has, therefore, sought a reconsideration of his de-

attachment from Delhi, which was favourably considered by the

Inspector General (Police), CRPF and forwarded with a favourable

recommendation on 12 December 2025.

6. Instead of taking action thereon, the respondent has abruptly

issued an order transferring the petitioner to Guwahati on 5 December

2025.

7. Mr. Bhargava submits that the respondents may possibly be

having a circular which entitle the petitioner to continue in posting till

the academic session of the child is over.

8. As of now, the recommendation of 12 December 2025

recommends that the petitioner be permitted to continue in Delhi till

31 March 2026.

9. Ms. Neha Rastogi, learned SPC for the respondents, seeks time

to take instructions.

10. Issue notice to show cause as to why rule nisi be not issued.

11. Notice is accepted on behalf of the respondents by Ms. Neha

Rastogi, learned SPC.

W.P.(C)19580/2025 Page2of

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 05:01:16

##PAGE3##

12. Counter-affidavit, if any, be filed within four weeks with

advance copy to learned Counsel for the petitioner who may file

rejoinder thereto within four weeks thereof.

13. Re-notify on 2 March 2026 for disposal.

14. In meanwhile, till the next date of hearing, the petitioner shall

be permitted to continue in Delhi, especially in view of the

recommendation dated 12 December 2025 of the Inspector General

(Police), CRPF.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.

DECEMBER 23, 2025

dsn

W.P.(C)19580/2025 Page3of

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 05:01:16

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top