IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
LT. COL. RAVNEET(RETD.) VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
W.P.(C) 19580/2025
##PAGE1##
$~26
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 19580/2025, CM APPL. 81828/2025 and CM APPL.
81829/2025
SI/PHARM PURN SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Neha Rastogi, SPC, Mr.
Animesh Rastogi, Mr. Rajat Dubey, Advs.
with Ms. Bhavana Bajaj, GP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
O R D E R
% 23.12.2025
CM APPL. 81829/2025 (for lengthy synopsis
1. For the reasons stated in the application, the lengthy synopsis
are permitted to be taken on record.
2. The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 19580/2025 and CM APPL. 81828/2025 (stay)
3. The petitioner is holding the post of SI (Pharma). He has been
transferred from Delhi to Guwahati on 5 December 2025. He assails
the said transfer.
4. In the writ petition, the petitioner has pointed out that his wife is
W.P.(C)19580/2025 Page1of
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 05:01:16
##PAGE2##suffering from anxiety neurosis, of his two daughters, one is suffering
from seizure disorder and epilepsy and both the daughters are in their
12th class academic session.
5. The petitioner has, therefore, sought a reconsideration of his de-
attachment from Delhi, which was favourably considered by the
Inspector General (Police), CRPF and forwarded with a favourable
recommendation on 12 December 2025.
6. Instead of taking action thereon, the respondent has abruptly
issued an order transferring the petitioner to Guwahati on 5 December
2025.
7. Mr. Bhargava submits that the respondents may possibly be
having a circular which entitle the petitioner to continue in posting till
the academic session of the child is over.
8. As of now, the recommendation of 12 December 2025
recommends that the petitioner be permitted to continue in Delhi till
31 March 2026.
9. Ms. Neha Rastogi, learned SPC for the respondents, seeks time
to take instructions.
10. Issue notice to show cause as to why rule nisi be not issued.
11. Notice is accepted on behalf of the respondents by Ms. Neha
Rastogi, learned SPC.
W.P.(C)19580/2025 Page2of
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 05:01:16
##PAGE3##12. Counter-affidavit, if any, be filed within four weeks with
advance copy to learned Counsel for the petitioner who may file
rejoinder thereto within four weeks thereof.
13. Re-notify on 2 March 2026 for disposal.
14. In meanwhile, till the next date of hearing, the petitioner shall
be permitted to continue in Delhi, especially in view of the
recommendation dated 12 December 2025 of the Inspector General
(Police), CRPF.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.
DECEMBER 23, 2025
dsn
W.P.(C)19580/2025 Page3of
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 05:01:16
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.