IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANKUR PLASTIC VS. SHRI RAMESH BATRA & ANR.
CRL.M.C. 9207/2025
##PAGE1##
$~22
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 9207/2025
ROHTASH SINGH AND ORS .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Anshuman Goswami and Mr.
K.K. Bharti, Advs.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for State with
SI Jaiveer Kumar, PS. Palam Village.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 23.12.2025
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023
seeking quashing of FIR No.400/2023 under Sections 288/304A IPC
registered at Police Station Palam Village and all consequential proceedings
emanating therefrom on the ground that the parties have arrived at a
settlement.
2. Issue notice. Ms. Kiran Bairwa, learned APP for the State accepts
notice.
3. Petitioner no.1, as well as, respondent nos. 2(complainant) and 3
(deceased wife of Diwakar Ram), who are present in Court, have been
identified bytheir respective counsel, as well as, bythe Investigating Officer
SI Jaiveer Kumar, PS. Palam Village.
4. The case of the prosecution is that petitioner no.1 was constructing his
house and for some electrical work he had engaged petitioner no.4/Prateek,
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 05:40:46
##PAGE2##as contractor for the said electrical work. Petitioner nos. 2 and 3 and
deceased Diwakar Ram was also working for petitioner no.4. When the
vibrator machine was installed by the deceased Diwakar Ram, immediately
he was electrocuted on account of which he died. The dispute between the
parties also led to the registration of present FIR.
5. Petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are stated to be labourers, whereas petitioner
no.4 is a petty contractor, and they do not have any wherewithal to pay for
the compensation. Therefore, it is the petitioner no.1, who is compensating
the respondent no. 3, the wife of deceased.
6. During pendency of the proceedings, the parties have arrived at a
settlement, terms whereof were reduced in writing in the form of Settlement
dated 09.08.2023, which is annexed as Annexure A to the present petition.
7. It is a term of the settlement between the parties that petitioner no.1
shall pay a total sum of Rs. 4.08 lacs to respondent no.3 towards full and
final settlement of all her claims on account of compensation etc. The entire
settlement amount has alreadybeen paid by petitioner no.1 to the respondent
no.3 in the manner as mentioned in the settlement.
8. The receipt of entire amount of Rs. 4.08 lacs is acknowledged by
respondent no.3, who is present in court.
9. Respondent no.3, on a query posed by the Court, affirms the factum
of settlement and states that she is satisfied with the compensation. She
further states that she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed.
10. At this stage, apt would it be to refer to the observations of the
Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303:
(SCC p. 340, para 58)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 05:40:46
##PAGE3##“58. Where the High Court quashes a criminal proceeding having
regard to the fact that the dispute between the offender and the
victim has been settled although the offences are not
compoundable, it does so as in its opinion, continuation of
criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in
the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an
end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the
ultimate guiding factor.”
11. In view of the settlement between the parties, the ultimate chances of
conviction in the case are bleak, therefore, continuation of criminal
proceedings will not serve any useful purpose and it will be an exercise in
futility.
12. It is, thus, in the interest of justice that the present FIR and all the
other proce
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.