IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LTD VS. AJANTA PHARMA LTD
CS(COMM) 636/2023
##PAGE1##
$~49
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(COMM) 636/2023
M/S TEJ RAM DHARAM PAUL .....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Raghav Bahlla, Adv.
versus
SUNDER LAL GOYAL & ANR. .....Defendants
Through: Ms. Shreya Gagneja, Adv. for D-1
(Through VC)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R
% 22.12.2025
I.A. 29392/2025
1. This application under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Civil Procedure Code,
1908 [‘CPC’] has been filed by the Plaintiff and Defendant No. 1 for
recording of compromise between the parties and the decree in the suit.
2. Ms. Shreya Gagneja, learned counsel for Defendant No. 1 states that
Defendant No. 1 has agreed to settle the suit on the terms and conditions set
out in paragraph no. ‘7’ of this application and has agreed to suffer a decree
of permanent injunction in terms of paragraph no. 67(a) to (g) of the plaint.
2.1. She states that Defendant No. 1 has also undertaken obligations to
withdraw its trademark applications as enlisted in paragraph no. ‘5’ of the
application.
2.2. She states that Defendant No. 1 is the Director of Defendant No. 2
company and Defendant No. 2 as well will remain bound by the terms and
CS(COMM) 636/2023 Page 1 of 3
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 08:35:23
##PAGE2##conditions agreed between Defendant No. 1 and the Plaintiff.
3. Mr. Raghav Bahlla, learned counsel for the Plaintiff confirms the
submissions of Defendant No. 1 and states that in view of settlement arrived
between the parties, the Plaintiff is not pressing for its remaining reliefs in
the plaint.
4. This Court is satisfied that the compromise between the parties as
contained in the captioned application satisfies the requirement of the Order
XXIII Rule 3 CPC; the agreement is lawful and therefore, this Court does
not find any impediment in disposing of the underlying suit in terms of the
aforenoted settlement.
5. The statement and undertakings given by the learned counsel for the
parties are accepted by this Court and the parties are held bound by the
same. The application is taken on record and marked as Exhibit C
6. Defendant No. 2 shall also remain bound by the undertakings given
by Defendant No. 1.
7. The suit is decreed in terms of paragraph nos. ‘5’ and ‘7’ of this
application. In addition, this suit is decreed for the relief of permanent
injunction in favour of the Plaintiff and against Defendant No. 1 in terms of
prayer clauses mentioned at paragraph no. 67(a) to (g) of the plaint.
8. The relief of delivery up, damages and costs as sought at paragraph no.
67(h) to (j) of the plaint are disposed of as not pressed.
9. The Registry of this Court is directed to prepare a decree in terms of
this order.
Refund of Court fees
10. Mr. Raghav Bahlla, learned counsel for the Plaintiff has also
requested for partial refund of court fees in favour of the Plaintiff.
CS(COMM) 636/2023 Page 2 of 3
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 08:35:23
##PAGE3##11. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and having regard to Section 16
and 16A of the Court Fees Act, 1870, the registry is directed to refund 50%
Court Fees in favour of Plaintiff within four [4] weeks, in accordance with
law.
12. It is made clear that if the Plaintiff approaches the Court for execution
of the decree, he shall make good the entire Court fees.
13. Pending applications, if any, stands disposed of.
14. All future dates stand cancelled.
15. The digitally signed copy of this order, duly uploaded on the official
website of the Delhi High Court, www.delhihighcourt.nic.in, shall be treated
as a certified copy of the order for the purpose of ensuring compliance. No
physical copy of order shall be insisted by any authority/entity or litigant.
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARO
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.