SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 47018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IMPRESSARIO ENTERTAINMENT AND HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. VS. VARDHAMAN CHOKSI AND ORS


$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M)-IPD 50/2025, CM 287/2025 & CM 288/2025 M/S VIBHAVA MARKETING CORPORATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saket Gogia, Ms. Gauri Pande, Ms. Sheetal Maggon and Mr.

Deepesh Meena, Advocates.

Versus GORAMAL HARI RAM LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Surinder Singh, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

O R D E R

% 22.12.2025

1. This is a Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying for setting aside the order dated 05.12.2005 (“Impugned Order”) passed in CS(COMM) No.185/2022 (“Suit”) by learned District Judge (Commercial Court)-01, Tis Hazari Courts, West District, Delhi (“Commercial Court”).

2. By way the Impugned Order, the learned Commercial Court dismissed three Applications filed by the Petitioner (Defendant in the Suit as under:

(i) Application under Order VIII Rule 9 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) seeking permission to file an additional Written Statement;

(ii) Application under Order VIII Rule 1A read with Order XI Rule

14 read with Section 151 of the CPC to bring additional documents on record; and (iii) Application under Order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top