IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IMPRESSARIO ENTERTAINMENT AND HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. VS. VARDHAMAN CHOKSI AND ORS
CM(M)-IPD 50/2025
##PAGE1##
$~45
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CM(M)-IPD 50/2025, CM 287/2025 & CM 288/2025
M/S VIBHAVA MARKETING CORPORATION .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Saket Gogia, Ms. Gauri
Pande, Ms. Sheetal Maggon and Mr.
Deepesh Meena, Advocates.
Versus
GORAMAL HARI RAM LIMITED .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Surinder Singh, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA
O R D E R
% 22.12.2025
1. This is a Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
praying for setting aside the order dated 05.12.2005 (“Impugned Order”)
passed in CS(COMM) No.185/2022 (“Suit”) by learned District Judge
(Commercial Court)-01, Tis Hazari Courts, West District, Delhi
(“Commercial Court”).
2. By way the Impugned Order, the learned Commercial Court
dismissed three Applications filed by the Petitioner (Defendant in the Suit
as under:
(i) Application under Order VIII Rule 9 read with Section 151 of
the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) seeking permission
to file an additional Written Statement;
CM(M)-IPD 50/2025 Page 1 of 4
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 09:31:28
##PAGE2##(ii) Application under Order VIII Rule 1A read with Order XI Rule
14 read with Section 151 of the CPC to bring additional
documents on record; and
(iii) Application under Order VIII Rule 1A read with Order XI Rule
14 read with Section 151 of the CPC to bring Legal
Proceedings Certificates (“LPCs”) on record.
3. As regards the Application for filing additional Written Statement, the
Impugned Order records that the said Application has been filed after an
inordinate and unexplained delay after the conclusion of evidence and at the
stage of final arguments and if Petitioner is permitted to file additional
Written Statement at that stage, it would result in reopening of evidence and
trial of the Suit de novo, which will cause irreparable prejudice to the
Respondent (Plaintiff in the Suit) and abuse of process of Court.
Accordingly, the said Application was dismissed with costs of ₹10,000/- to
be paid to the Respondent.
4. The second Application filed for placing on record the Trade Mark
Registration Certificates pertaining to Marks “MONKEY 555 WONDER
WASH” and “MONKEY 555 THUNDER WASH” bearing registration Nos.
5211202 and 5213105, registered on 10.02.2024 and 07.02.2024
respectively (“Registration Certificates”), was also dismissed with costs of
₹10,000/- to be paid to the Respondent on the ground that the Registration
Certificates were issued more than 15 months ago and during that period the
Suit was listed for 13 times, yet the Petitioner never disclosed the existence
of the Registration Certificates.
CM(M)-IPD 50/2025 Page 2 of 4
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 09:31:28
##PAGE3##5. The third Application seeking leave to place on record the LPCs of
the Trade Mark bearing Nos. 521102 and 5213105 was also dismissed with
costs of ₹10,000/- to be paid to the Respondent on the ground that LPCs do
not constitute any new or independent document and are nothing but formal
authenticated copies of the registrations granted as of 07.02.2024 and
10.02.2024 and obtained only on 29.05.2025 i.e. more than 15 months after
the grant of the registrations.
6. The Impugned Order also records that no explanation whatsoever has
been provided by the Petitioner, who has been in power and possession of
the Registration Certificates and LPCs, as well as for seeking to file the
additional Written Statement.
7. This Petition was first listed on 19.12.2025 when after some
arguments, the learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner and learned
Counsel for Respondent sought time to take instructions. Accordingly, the
matter was listed on 23.12.2025.
8. When the mat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.