SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 47038

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, Shail Jain, JJ
M/S REGENT GARAGE PVT LTD & ANR VS. J.M.S RAWAT & ORS
CONT.CAS(C) 619/2019|W.P.(C) 8730/2018|W.P.(C) 2526/2019|W.P.(C) 9234/2019|W.P.(C) 8732/2018|W.P.(C) 8733/2018|W.P.(C) 8734/2018|W.P.(C) 8735/2018|W.P.(C) 8736/2018|W.P.(C) 8739/2018|W.P.(C) 8740/2018|W.P.(C) 8741/2018|W.P.(C) 8742/2018|W.P.(C) 8743/2018|W.P.(C) 8744/2018|W.P.(C) 8745/2018|W.P.(C) 8855/2018|W.P.(C) 8857/2018|W.P.(C) 8950/2018|W.P.(C) 8951/2018|W.P.(C) 10670/2018|W.P.(C) 189/2019|W.P.(C) 190/2019|W.P.(C) 191/2019|W.P.(C) 192/2019|W.P.(C) 494/2019|W.P.(C) 6766/2021|W.P.(C) 4628/2025|W.P.(C) 6421/2025|W.P.(C) 9754/2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: J.K. Mittal, Vandana Mittal, Mukesh Choudhary, Mayank Nagi, Husnal Syali, Tarun Singh, Karanjot Singh Mainee, Shreya Gupta, Sahil Chopra, Manya Kaushik, Ramashish, Rishabh Jain
For the Respondents: Harpreet Singh, Suhani Mathur, Shivali Saxena, Jatin Gaur, Akshay Saxena, R. Ramachandran, Prateek Dhir, Anurag Ojha, Dipak Raj, Shashank Kumar, Avinash Shukla, Ramjee Panday, Anushree Narain, Naman Choula, Yamit Jetley, Akshay Amritanshu, Drishti Rawal, Mayur Goyal, Sarthak Srivastava, Rajesh Kumar, Yash Narain, Vivek Goyal, Gokul Sharma, Arjan Aggarwal, Shiva Lakshmi, Madhav Bajaj, Ripudaman Bhardwaj, Kushagra Kumar, Amit Kumar Rana, Sushil Kumar Pandey, Satish Aggarwala, Mala Sharma, Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Sumit Kumar Raj

This is a procedural order recording the completion of the petitioner's arguments and scheduling the hearing for the respondents' submissions.

Headnote:The present matter involves a series of consolidated writ petitions and a contempt case filed by various automobile dealerships against the Union of India and other adjudicating authorities. The proceedings are currently at the stage of oral arguments. No specific legal issues were framed or decided in this order. The court noted the conclusion of submissions by the counsel for the petitioner in one of the consolidated matters. The matter is listed for 17th January, 2026 for the respondents to make their submissions.

Table of Content
1. procedural scheduling and recording of submissions in a consolidated hearing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

O R D E R

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. Mr. Mayank Nagi, ld. Counsel for the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 2526/2019 titled Bird Automotive Private Limited vs. Adjudicating Authority, Additional Director General (Adjudication), New Delhi & Anr. has concluded his submissions.

3. List on 17th January, 2026 for the ld. Counsels for the Respondent to make their submissions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top