SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 47061

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SMT RANI DEVI VS. SH DINESH KUMAR & ANR.


$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 432/2025, CM APPL. 80614/2025 (Stay) &

CM APPL. 80615/2025 (Ex.)

ARADHANA TRIPATHI, .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sudeep Dey, Adv.

versus ANURAG KAKKAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Arora & Mr.

Anirudh Sharma, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

O R D E R

% 19.12.2025

1. The present appeal has been filed on behalf of the Appellant under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984, assailing the Order dated 11.12.2025 [“Impugned Order”] passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, South West, Dwarka, New Delhi in MT. Case No. 30/19 titled “Anurag Kakkar vs. Aradhana Tripathi.”

2. By way of the Impugned Order, the learned Family Court, while declining the application filed by the Respondent for interim custody of the minor child during winter vacations, has granted visitation rights to him during the said period, i.e., from 25.12.2025 till 01.01.2025, from 11:00 am to 3:00 pm in Children room, Family Court, Kolhapur, Maharashtra.

3. The minor child, namely, Aadyaansh Raj Kakkar, aged about 12 years, is in the care and custody of the Appellant. The Resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top