SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 47098

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jasmeet Singh, J
CAPRIC CONTRACTS PRIVATE LIMITED VS. GNEX REALTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
ARB.P. 1961/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sanjay Bansal
For the Respondents: None

The court will appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, upon finding a valid arbitration agreement and the existence of disputes, regardless of the respondent's non-appearance if service is complete.

Headnote:The petition was filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the appointment of an arbitrator. The dispute arose from a work order for civil construction of a sugar plant and cogen power plant, where the project was delayed and the respondent allegedly failed to make full payment despite admitting liability. The court found that the General Conditions of Contract contained a valid arbitration clause under Clause 44. The primary issue was whether an arbitrator should be appointed to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The court observed that there is a valid arbitration clause and disputes exist which need to be adjudicated through the arbitral mechanism, noting that the respondent remained unrepresented despite being served via email. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Table of Content
1. facts regarding construction dispute and invocation of arbitration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. validation of arbitration clause and existence of disputes. (Para 8)
3. appointment of sole arbitrator and disposal of petition. (Para 9 , 10)

$~22

*

O R D E R

1. This is a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes between the parties.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent issued a Work Order to the petitioner for the civil construction work for 5000 TCD sugar plant with 27 MW Cogen Power Plant Expandable up to 7500 TCD at Ramala Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. Ramala Baghpat (Uttar Pradesh). The stipulated date for completion of the project was 15.01.2019 however, it was delayed.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that despite admitting the liability and agreeingtopayitthroughinstalments,onlypartialpaymenthasbeenmadeby the respondent.

4. The General Conditions of Contract (“GCC”) of the issued work order contains Clause No. 44 of the GCC as the arbitration clause, which reads as under:

“44. Arbitration: All disputes of any kind whatever arising during the progress of work or after their completion, shall be settled by the Arbitrator appointed by the Employer under the provisionofArbitrationandConciliationAct,1996asamended from time to time.”

5. Since there were defaults, the petitioner invoked arbitration vide legal notice served on 05.08.2025 and thereafter filed the present petition.

6. As per the Work Order the email ID of the respondent is info@usipl.com.

7. TherespondenthasbeenservedatthesaidemailIDanddespiteservice there is nobody appearing on behalf of the respondent.

8. I am satisfied that there is a valid Arbitration Clause and there are disputes which need to be adjudicated through the Arbitral mechanism.

9. For the said reasons, the petition is allowed and the following directions are issued:-

i) Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain (Advocate) (Mob. No. 9811387311) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

ii) The arbitration will be held under the aegis and rules of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘DIAC’).

iii) The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of DIAC (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators’ Fees) Rules, 2018.

iv) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Act prior to entering into the reference.

v) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claim, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims/counter-claims and merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

vi) The petitioner shall approach the learned Arbitrator within two weeks from today.

10. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top