SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 47134

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J
INCYTE HOLDINGS CORPORATION & ORS. VS. EXEMED PHARMACEUTICALS
CS(COMM) 1370/2025 | I.A. 31954/2025 | I.A. 31955/2025 | I.A. 31956/2025 | I.A. 31957/2025 | I.A. 31958/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Swapnil Srivastava, Vivek Jain, Rishabh Periwal
For the Respondents: Shashank Mishra

Grant of ex-parte ad-interim injunction in cases of trademark infringement and impersonation via digital platforms to prevent public fraud and protect personality rights when a prima facie case and balance of convenience are established.

Headnote:The plaintiffs sought an interim injunction and other reliefs against the defendants for unauthorized use of trademarks and personality rights. The case involves the application of Order XI Rule 1(4), Order II Rule 2, and Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court found that the first defendant was impersonating the plaintiffs on WhatsApp to defraud the public by using the plaintiffs' registered trademarks and the name and image of the Chief Business Officer. The primary issue was whether a prima facie case existed to grant an ex-parte ad-interim injunction to prevent further fraud and trademark infringement. The court reasoned that the unauthorized use of trademarks and personality rights was clearly designed to deceive customers and members of trade, establishing a prima facie case where the balance of convenience favored the plaintiffs and irreparable loss would occur without restraint. Consequently, the court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining the first defendant from using the plaintiffs' trademarks, name, and image, and directed the second defendant to provide Basic Subscriber Information and take down the infringing accounts.

Table of Content
1. disposal of interlocutory applications regarding additional documents, mediation exemption, and procedural liberties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
2. registration of commercial suit and direction to intermediaries for basic subscriber information (bsi). (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
3. allegations of trademark infringement and impersonation via whatsapp to defraud the public. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
4. determination of prima facie case and balance of convenience for granting interim injunction. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
5. grant of ex-parte ad-interim injunction and directions to enforcement agencies for cyber crime investigation. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)

O R D E R

I.A. 31955/2025

(seeking leave to file additional documents)

1. This is an application seeking leave to file additional documents under Order XI Rule 1(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 [‘CPC’] [as amended by the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (‘Commercial Courts Act’)] read with Section 151 CPC, within thirty (30) days.

2. The Plaintiffs, if they wish to file additional documents will file the same within thirty (30) days from today, and they shall do so strictly as per the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act and the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 (‘DHC Rules’).

3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.

4. Accordingly, the application is disposed of.

I.A. 31956/2025

(seeking exemption from pre-mediation litigation)

5. This is an application under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act read with Section 151 CPC, filed by the Plaintiffs seeking exemption from instituting pre-litigation mediation.

6. Having regard to the facts that the present suit contemplates urgent interim relief and in light of the judgement of the Supreme Court in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Keerthi1(2024) 5 SCC 815, exemption from the requirement of pre-institution mediation is granted to the Plaintiffs.

7. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

I.A. 31958/2025

(seeking exemption from effecting advance service upon the Defendants)

8. This is an application filed under Section 151 of the CPC on behalf of the Plaintiffs seeking exemption from effecting advance service upon the Defendants.

9. For the reasons stated in the captioned application, this application is allowed.

10. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

I.A. 31957/2025(under Order II Rule 2)

11. This is an application filed under Order II Rule 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC, 1908.

12. For the reasons stated in the application, the liberty prayed for at paragraphs 2 and 3 of this application is granted to the Plaintiff.

13. The application is disposed of.

CS(COMM) 1370/2025

14. The present suit has been filed for inter-alia declaration, prohibitory and mandatory injunction, personality rights and other ancillary reliefs against the Defendants.

15. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.

16. Defendant no. 1 are John Doe entities, who are stated to be the users of WhatsApp.

17. Mr. Shashank Mishra, Advocate enters appearance on behalf of Defendant no. 2/WhatsApp.

18. Defendant no. 2 is directed to provide Basic Subscriber Information [‘BSI’] details of the mobile numbers provided at Annexure A to the extent available, attached to this Order, within a period of two (2) weeks. Defendant no. 2 will file BSI details in a sealed cover after providing a copy to the Plaintiffs.

19. The Plaintiff is directed to file an amended memo of parties within one (1) week after receiving the correct BSI details of the users from the Defendant No. 2/WhatsApp.

20. Upon amended memo of parties being filed, summons will be issued by the registry to the said newly impleaded entities.

21. No summons are being issued to the Defendant No. 2/WhatsApp as it is a proforma party.

22. List before Court on 14.04.2025.

I.A. 31954/20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top