SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 47136

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ABHINAY SHARMA & ANR. VS. JOHN DOE / ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS.


$~45 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1376/2025& I.As. 32016-23/2025 INCYTE HOLDINGS CORPORATION & ORS. .....Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Mamta R. Jha, Mr. Abhay Tondon and Ms. Kirti, Advocates versus SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H., Mr. Tahir A. J.

and Ms. Aeshita Marwah, Advocates CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

O R D E R

% 19.12.2025

1. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.

2. Issue summons.

3. Mr. Tahir A.J., Advocate, accepts summons on behalf of the Defendant. He confirms the receipt of suit paper-book and waives the right of formal service of summons.

4. The present suit pertains to infringement of Plaintiff No. 1’s Indian Patent No. 269841 [‘Suit Patent’ or IN’841], which protects the novel and inventive compound ‘Ruxolitinib’. In particular, Claims No. 1, 17 and 21 of the Suit Patent coverand claim the patented compound ‘Ruxolitinib’, pharmaceutically acceptable salt, and composition thereof respectively. This drug is used in the treatment of intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis, a type of myeloproliferative disorder that affects the bone marrow, and for polycythemia vera [‘PV’], when there has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top