US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
UOI VS. RAM PYARI DECD. THR .LR'S
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 868/2025 PRITI SARAF .....Appellant Through: Mr. Mudit Jain, Adv.(through VC) with Ms. Mahima Malhotra & Mr. Aayush Goswami, Advs.
versus AJAY SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aman Panwar, Mr. Harsh Gattani & Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Advs./R1 Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Kamakshi Gupta & Mr.
Rishabh Dahiya, Advs./R3 CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR
O R D E R
% 19.12.2025 CM APPL. 79138/2025
1. This is an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed on behalf of the appellant seeking extension of time for compliance of the Order dated 15.09.2025 passed by this Court in RFA 868/2025 whereby, the appellant was required to vacate the suit premises bearing no.27A, Green Avenue Lane, Vasant Kun
The exclusion of the period from 15.03.2020 till 28.02.2022 for the purpose of limitation, as prescribed by the orders passed by the Supreme Court in Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, and t....
The Court emphasized the objective of speedy possession under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act and held that the legal heirs' actions prolonged the possession, negating the objective. The legal heirs ....
The Court emphasized the objective of speedy possession for landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act and found that the tenant's prolonged proceedings and subsequent review petition were an ab....
The landlord's bona fide need for the tenanted premises under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act and the tenant's liability for use and occupation charges.
A co-owner can independently file for eviction under rent control laws, and the landlord's bona fide need for property use outweighs tenant hardship claims.
The death of a landlord necessitates that a legal heir must establish their own bonafide requirement for premises independently, distinguishing it from the deceased's claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article