SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 47203

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MOHAMMAD SALIM VS. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
W.P.(C) 17241/2025



$~67 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 17241/2025 RAJESH POLAVARAPU THROUGH SPA MUVVA VENKATA SRIKANTH .....Petitioner Through: Mohammad Ather Ansari & Mr.

Vijay Kanth, Advs.

versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vishal Chadha, SSC with Mr Chandan Kumar, Advs for Customs.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

O R D E R

% 18.12.2025

1. The hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking release of the detained goods i.e., four gold bangles weighing 174 grams (hereinafter, four gold bangles'), which were detained by the Customs Department on 2nd October, 2023.

3. A brief background of the case is that the Petitioner is a resident of the USA, who had travelled to India on 2nd October, 2023. Upon his arrival at the Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi, he was intercepted by the concerned officials of the Customs Department and the four gold bangles were seized by the Customs Department, vide detention receipt dated 2nd October, 2023. The four gold bangles were appraised on 23rd October, 2023.

4. The Order-in-Original has been passed in this matter and the same is dated 14th November, 2023. The said Order-in-Original directs as under:

“ORDER i) I deny the 'Free Allowance' if any, admissible to the Pax Ms. Rajesh Polavarapu for not declaring the detained goods to the Proper Officer at Red Channel as well to the Customs Officer at Green Channel who intercepted him and recovered the detained goods from him.

ii) I declare the passenger, Mr. Rajesh Polavarapu, is an "ineligible Passenger" for the purpose of the Notification No. 50/2017-Customs dated 30.06.2017 (as amended) read with Baggage Rules, 2016 (as amended).

Iii) I order confiscation of the "Four gold bangles weighing 174 gms having purity 999 and valued at Rs. 9,51,469.41/-" recovered from the Pax Mr. Rajesh Polavarapu and detained vide DR No. DR/INDEL4/02-10-2023/002747 dt.02-10-2023 under section 111(d), 111(j) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962;

iv) I give an option to redeem, the goods confiscated, above, on payment of fine of Rs. 1,20,000/-(Rupees One Lac Twenty Thousand Only) under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 and allow the same for re-export from India only by the Pax since the Pax possesses a valid USA Passport No. 582389427. I allow redemption of the detained goods within 120 days of issue of this order under Section 125(3) of the Customs Act, 1962). The redemption is allowed after the completion of legal formalities in this regard and also on fulfillment of any regulatory clearances/ approvals/ payments, as required. The offer of redemption, if accepted, shall be subject to condition that the Passenger shall not dispute the identity and valuation of the goods. The offer of redemption shall cease after 120 days of the receipt of this order.

v) I also impose a penalty of Rs.95,000/-(Rupees Ninety Five Thousand Only) on the Pax Ms. Rajesh Polavarapu under section 112 (a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962.”

5. In the opinion of this court, it does not appear that the above order has been communicated to the Petitioner by the Department. After perusing the option for redemption, the Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to redeem the goods for the purpose of re-export after paying the penalty and the redemption fine.

6. Accordingly, let the Order-In-Original dated 14th November, 2023 be given effect to within one month. The Petitioner is permitted to appear before the department on 14th January, 2026, either by himself or through an authorised representative. If the Petitioner appears through an authorised representative with the Authority Letter, then he shall join virtually to confirm that the goods can be released.

7. The Nodal Officer mentioned below shall facilitate the Petitioner’s appearance before the competent authority for compliance with the present

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top