$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 576/2025, CRL.M.A. 37887/2025 XXXX .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate.

versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 18.12.2025

1. This revision petition assails order dated 29^th October, 2025, passed by the Sessions Court, dismissing the Petitioner’s appeal under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005., “DV Act” The appeal arose from order dated 25^th April, 2025 passed by the Mahila Court, Karkardooma Courts, whereby (i) the Petitioner’s plea seeking residence rights in respect of the premises at Vijay Vihar, Delhi was declined on the ground that the said premises was not shown, even prima facie, to be a “shared household” within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act, and (ii) the prayer for additional interim monetary relief was rejected, noticing that the Petitioner was already receiving ₹20,000/- per month as ad-interim maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.2

2. The Petitioner (wife) and the Respondent (husband) married on