SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 47273

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PAYAL VS. STATE (NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR.
CRL.M.C. 7212/2025



$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 7212/2025 MOHD. AKHTAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counsel Mr.

Lokesh Khanna, Adv.

Versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State along with SI Vinod Kumar.

R-2 with her counsel CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 18.12.2025 CRL.M.A. 30283/2025 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 7212/2025

3. By way of present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR bearing no. 25/2018, registered at Police Station Anand Parbaat, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323/341/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ‘IPC’).

4. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Anand Parbaat, Delhi.

5. Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that on 18.01.2018, respondent no. 2 had lodged a complaint against the petitioner about an incident, and based on the aforesaid event, the present FIR was registered against the petitioners under the relevant sections. It is stated that both the parties have amicably settled the present matter vide Compromise Deed dated 07.10.2025, entered between them.

6. On a query made by this Court, respondent no.2 who has been identified by the concerned IO, has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. It is also stated by respondent no. 2 that the entire dispute has been amicably settled between the parties. Respondent no. 2 further states that she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

7. In view of the above fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

8. Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 25/2018, registered at Police Station Anand Parbaat, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323/341/506/34 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed, subject to the deposit of costs of ₹10,000/- each by both the petitioners subject to the petitioners depositing the cost of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. 10,000 each), with National Thalassemia Welfare Society, within 15 days from date. The details of the account are given as under:

Account Number: 90911210000799 IFSC Code: CNRB0019091 Bank Name: Canara Bank Branch: Vikaspuri II, Delhi

9. Copy of the receipt be also filed with the Registry to show compliance of the order and provide the receipt to the IO of the case.

10. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of.

11. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J DECEMBER 18, 2025/A/GJ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top