$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.(NI) 289/2025 & CRL.M.A. 37656/2025, CRL.M.(BAIL) 2495/2025 VINOD @ VINOD KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar, Mr. Praphul E.

Jha and Mr. Vijay P., Advocates.

versus TEJPAL .....Respondent Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 17.12.2025

1. This revision petition under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is directed against the appellate judgment dated 11^th November, 2025. By this impugned judgment, conviction order dated 19^th April, 2024 and the order on sentence dated 22^nd May, 2024, passed by the Court of MM (NI Act)-07 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi in CT Case No. 16907/2019 titled “Tejpal v. Vinod”, have been affirmed. As a result, the Petitioner stands convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, “NI Act” and has been directed to pay a fine of INR 15,00,000/-, as compensation to the complainant. In default, the Petitioner is to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.

2. The facts, as emerging from the record, as follows:

2.1. The complainant (Respondent) stated that he and the accused (Petitioner) hail fr