$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1/2019 SHRI DEEPAK KUMAR ROHILLA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. S. C. Singhal and Mr. Saideep Kaushik, Advs.

versus SHRI ANIL KUMAR ROHILLA & ANR ......Defendants Through: Mr. Tushar Mahajan, Mr. Bhaavan Mahajan and Mr. Tanmay S. Surana, Advs. for D-1 CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

O R D E R

% 16.12.2025 I.A. 31529/2025

1. The present Application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A and Rule 4 of the CPC read with Section 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, has been preferred by the Defendant No. 1, seeking issuance of contempt against Defendant No. 2 for disobedience of the status quo Order dated

08.01.2019 passed by this Court.

2. The present Suit has been instituted by the Plaintiff seeking partition of the undivided property bearing No. A3/148, Janakpuri, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘Suit Property’) into three equal shares so that each party, i.e., the Plaintiff, and the two Defendants, are each allotted one-

third share in the Suit Property.

3. This Court, vide Order dated 08.01.2019, while issuing summons in the present Suit, directed the parties to maintain status quo with regards to possession of the Suit