$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12666/2023 & CM APPLs. 49925/2023, 54557/2023, 57434/2023, 67016/2023 DEVENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Ms. Surbhi Sejwal and Mr. Kamal Kishor, Advocates.

versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva, Mr. Shivam Takiar, Mr. Prateek Dhir and Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advocates for R-1/DDA.

Ms. Avni Singh, Panel Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate for R-2 and 3/GNCTD.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

O R D E R

% 16.12.2025

1. This writ petition is filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-

“i. Writ of certiorari and/or such other suitable writ, order, direction in the like nature whereby the Demarcation/TSM proceedings of Khasra No.98/2 and Khasra No.116 got carried out by Respondent No.1 through SDM, Hauz Khas on 22.06.2023 and fixed/pakka points were taken, as conveyed to the petitioner vide Letter F.NO.SZ(72)2021/DD/LM/SZ/DDA/926 dated 13 .09.2023 be quashed and set aside being contrary to the order dated 13.02.2023 of the Hon'ble High Court passed in WP(C) No.1806/2023 titled as Devender Kumar vs. Delhi Development Authority and also in violation of procedure in 'Hadd-Shikni cases' as contained in Chapter-l Part-M of the Delhi High Court Rules;

ii. a writ of mandamus or such other writ or direction in the like nature whereby the Respondents may be directed to carry out the fresh demarcation of the subject property and the DDA land by issuing prior notice to Petitioner and by following the guidelines and the procedure provided under the Hadd-Shikni cases as contained in Chapter-I Part-M of Delhi High Court Rules;

iii. a writ of prohibition and/or such other writ/order or directions in the like nature thereby officers, representatives and administrators of Respondent No.1 (DDA) may be restrained from in any manner demolishing or caused to be demolished the subject property. Khasra No.98/2 (1-04) and Khasra No.116 (0-17) admeasuring 2050 sq. yards., situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Begumpur, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi. Presently known as Begumpur P.O. Malviya Nagar, New Delhi except by carrying out proper demarcation in accordance with the order dated 13.02.2023 and by following the procedure in Hadd-Shikni cases and by giving proper notice to the Petitioner as mandated by order dated

13.02.2023 passed in WPC 1806/2023;

iv. to issue such other appropriate writ, order or directions thereby directing the Respondent No.1 to produce the complete record of the alleged demarcation proceedings/TSM proceedings of Khasra No.98/2 and Khasra No.116 Village Begampur, Delhi carried out on 22.06.2022 as conveyed by Letter No. SZ (72)2021/DD/LM/SZ/DDA/926 dated

13.09.2023;

v. Any other writ, order or directions which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances may also be issued in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents.

vi. The cost of the proceedings may be awarded in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents.”

2. Be it noted that even earlier, Petitioner had approached this Court by way of W.P.(C) 1806/2023, where directions were issued by Court to DDA to carry out demarcation of the property bearing Khasra No.98/2 (1-04) and Khasra No.116 (0-17), admeasuring 2050 sq. yards. situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Begumpur, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi (‘subject land’)

after serving notice on the Petitioner to participate in the demarcation.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that demarcation has been carried out, but Petitioner was not put to notice or called to participate in the demarcation despite order of this Court and there are serious flaws in the demarcation carried out.

4. Ms. Takiar, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 1/DDA submits that in terms of the order of this Court, demarcation has been carried out and if the Petition