$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 1814/2025 TATA CAPITAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Kumar and Mr. Ragini Kapoor, Advs.

versus M/S CHETNA ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED.....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok Chhaparia, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 16.12.2025

1. This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes between the parties.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner advanced a loan under a Loan cum Guarantee Agreement dated 23.10.2023 for a sum of Rs. 2 crores vide sanction letter dated 23.10.2023.The Respondent defaulted in repaying the said loan amount.

3. The Loan cum Guarantee Agreement contains an arbitration clause being Clause 11 which reads as under:

“If any dispute, difference or claim arises between any of the Obligors and the Lender in connection with the Facility or as to the interpretation, validity, implementation or effect of the Facility Documents or as to the rights and liabilities of the parties under these T&Cs or-alleged breachof the Facility Documents oranything done or omitted to be don