SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 47574

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CAPITAL APPARELS TECHNOLOGY (P) LTD. VS. COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. & ORS.


$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1669/2024 R S ENTERPRISES .....Petitioner Through: None.

versus SALES TAX OFFICE CLASS II/ AVATO WARD 62 &

ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shubham Tyagi, SSC, CBIC with Ms. Navruti Ojha, Adv.

Mr. K.G.Gopalakrishnan, Adv.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

O R D E R

% 15.12.2025

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the Show Cause Notice (hereinafter, ‘SCN’) dated 01st August, 2021 as also the Order for Cancellation of Registration dated 19th July, 2022 (hereinafter, ‘impugned order’). The said order was challenged by the Petitioner before the concerned Appellate Authority, however, the same was dismissed vide order dated 22nd December, 2023.

3. In the present case the Petitioner was issued a SCN on 01st August, 2021 as to why the GST Registration of the Petitioner ought not to be cancelled. The grounds alleged in the SCN were of fraud, willful mis- statement and suppression of facts. The Petitioner was directed to file a reply to the SCN.

4. On the aspect of reply, there is som

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top