SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 47632

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VEENA SINGHAL VS. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.


$~114 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MR. SHISHANK PAL & ORS. …..Petitioners Through: Mr. Kumar Utkarsh and Ms. Udisha Mishra, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Udit Dedhiya, SPC along with Ms. Apurva Sachdeva, Mr. Preyansh Gupta and Mr. Shivam Kumar, GP, Advocates for R-1.

Advocate (appearance not given) for R-2.

Ms. Nandita Rao, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Vipin Saini and Mr.

Lakshay Saini, Advocates for R-3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

O R D E R

% 15.12.2025 CM APPL. 78797/2025 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 18930/2025 & CM APPL. 78796/2025 (Stay)

3. Issue notice.

4. Learned counsels, as aforesaid, accept notice on behalf of the respondent nos.1, 2 & 3 respectively.

5. Let reply be filed by the respondents within a period of four weeks from today. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within a period of two weeks thereafter.

6. The petitioners, who claim to be a group of distinguished professional Wushu coaches, submit that many deserving players could not participate in the trials held on 06.12.2025 and 07.12.2025 for the purpose of participation in the 9th Federati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top