SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 47683

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DEEPSHIKHA KUMARI VS. LEELA INFRASTRUCTURE MINING PVT LTD & ANR.


$~17 & 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2492/2022 MAHVISH KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Osama Suhail, Ms. Aishwarya Raj and Ms. Antara Chaudhury, Advocates with Petitioner (through VC).

versus SHAHNAWAZ KHAN TARIN .....Respondent Through: Md. Qamar Ali, Mr. Sudarshan Rajan and Ms. Priyanka Hitain Bajaj, Advocates.

+ CRL.REV.P. 211/2022 & CRL.M.As. 6706/2022, 7882/2022, 25024/2022 SHAHNAWAZ KHAN TARIN .....Petitioner Through: Md. Qamar Ali, Mr. Sudarshan Rajan and Ms. Priyanka Hitain Bajaj, Advocates.

versus MAHAVISH KHAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Osama Suhail, Ms. Aishwarya Raj and Ms. Antara Chaudhury, Advocates with Respondent (through VC).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 12.12.2025

1. These connected petitions stem from a common interim order dated 17th March, 2020 passed on an application under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, “DV Act” in Complaint Case No. 15306/2019. By that interim order, Shahnawaz Khan Tarin, the husband, was directed, pending trial, to pay interim maintenance of INR 2,00,000/- per month and INR 1,00,000/- per month towards rent in lieu of alternative accommodation to Mahvi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top