SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 47898

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CBI VS. HIMANSHU JAIN


$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8727/2025 & CRL.M.A. 36439-36442/2025 SALIL TALWAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aakash Sachdeva & Ms. Nutan Sinha, Advs.

versus SHAM CHARAN ARORA .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 08.12.2025

1. This Petitioner, an accused in complaint case no. 4599/2017 titled “Sham Charan Arora vs. Talwar Jewellers and Ors.” under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881,, “the NI Act” assails order dated 7th August, 2025 passed by JMFC (N.I. Act)-04, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. By the impugned order, the Trial Court, while allowing the Petitioner’s request to examine certain defence witnesses, rejected the request to summon proposed witness nos. 3, 4, 6 and 8.

2. The proposed witnesses as per the list as under: -

“3. Concerned staff / clerk, from State Bank of India, DE-83 Tagore Garden Branch New Delhi, with original cheques No. 011096, 011097, 011098 & 335507 issued by M/s Talwar Jewellers from A/c No. 33565970426 and statement of account No. 33565970426 from 01.10.2014 to 31.12.2015 and

01.10.2016 to 30.10.2016 and 01.01.2017 to 30.09.2017 duly certified

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top