IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CBI VS. HIMANSHU JAIN
$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8727/2025 & CRL.M.A. 36439-36442/2025 SALIL TALWAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aakash Sachdeva & Ms. Nutan Sinha, Advs.
versus SHAM CHARAN ARORA .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 08.12.2025
1. This Petitioner, an accused in complaint case no. 4599/2017 titled “Sham Charan Arora vs. Talwar Jewellers and Ors.” under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881,, “the NI Act” assails order dated 7th August, 2025 passed by JMFC (N.I. Act)-04, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. By the impugned order, the Trial Court, while allowing the Petitioner’s request to examine certain defence witnesses, rejected the request to summon proposed witness nos. 3, 4, 6 and 8.
2. The proposed witnesses as per the list as under: -
“3. Concerned staff / clerk, from State Bank of India, DE-83 Tagore Garden Branch New Delhi, with original cheques No. 011096, 011097, 011098 & 335507 issued by M/s Talwar Jewellers from A/c No. 33565970426 and statement of account No. 33565970426 from 01.10.2014 to 31.12.2015 and
01.10.2016 to 30.10.2016 and 01.01.2017 to 30.09.2017 duly certified
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.