IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BARISTA COFFEE COMPANY LIMITED VS. M/S MAYAL ENTERPRISES & ANR.
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 1098/2025 BARISTA COFFEE COMPANY LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Mehandru, Charu Tandon, Raghav Tandon, NIkhil Kharaliya, Advocates (through VC)
versus M/S MAYAL ENTERPRISES & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 08.12.2025
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter ‘Act’) seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for the adjudication of the disputes between the parties arising out of the Facility Agreement dated 19th October, 2021 (hereinafter ‘Agreement’).
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Agreement contains an arbitration clause, i.e. Clause 24, which provides for adjudication of any disputes arising between the parties by way of arbitration. For ease of reference, Clause 24 of the Agreement is set out below:
3. He further submits that since the respondents were in constant and wilful breach of the terms of the Agreement (including non-payment of royalty to the petitioner), the petitioner sent a notice dated 17th September, 2024 to the respondents invoking the af
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.