Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Non-Compliance on Counter Affidavits Draws Exemplary Costs Warning: Supreme Court in Gauri Maulekhi PIL
13 Mar 2026
SLPs Challenging PoP Idol Immersion Orders Disposed as Infructuous; Liberty to Assist Bombay HC: Supreme Court
13 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HIMALAYA WELLNESS COMPANY AND ORS VS. VLADO SKY ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 777/2024 SPORTA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., AND ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Prithvi Singh & Ms. Vanshika Singh, Advocates.
versus ANKIT CHAUDHARY ALIAS ANKIT SHEORAN AND ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC along with Ms. Ira Singh & Mr. Aryan Dhaka, Advocates for Defendant Nos.6 & 7.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA
O R D E R
% 08.12.2025 I.A. 26697/2025
1. This is an Application under Order VI Rule 17 read with Order I Rule
10 read and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”).
2. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs submits that vide order dated 10.09.2024, an ex-parte ad interim injunction was granted against the D
The court affirmed the rights of trademark owners against unauthorized use, ruling that failure to defend constitutes grounds for summary judgment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Defendant's use of a deceptively similar mark to the Plaintiff's registered trademark amounted to trademark infringement and passing off, ....
Rule 3 of Order XIIIA, CPC, as applicable to commercial disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article