SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 48144

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MANISH KUMAR & ORS. VS. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
CRL.M.C. 8608/2025



$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8608/2025 KRISHAN SINGH AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Surinder Singh, Mr. Shivendu Gaur, Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Disha Singh, Advocates with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Mr. Chetan Dahiya, Advocate.

Counsel (appearance not given) for R-

2 and R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 03.12.2025 CRL.M.A. 35974/2025 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 8608/2025

3. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR bearing No. 0137/2023, registered at Police Station Vasant Kunj South, of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ‘IPC’) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties.

4. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

5. All the petitioners and respondent nos. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO)

concerned, Police Station, Vasant Kunj South, Delhi.

6. Brief facts of the case are that on 27.02.2023, due to civil dispute between the petitioners and respondent no. 2 on some immovable property, various differences and issues had arisen between the petitioners and the respondent no. 2. Upon a complaint filed by respondent no. 2, the present FIR came to be registered against the petitioners. It is state that a cross-FIR bearing no. 0240/2023 had also been registered in the present case. It is further stated that with intervention of the family and friends, the parties have now amicably settled their dispute vide Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 29.10.2025.

7. On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the IO, has categorically stated that he has entered into compromise out of his own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, he has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

8. In view of the above fact, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

9. Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 0137/2023, registered at Police Station Sections 325/341/34 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed subject to the petitioners depositing a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with the Civil and Sessions Courts Stenographer Association, Delhi and the compliance report of the same be filed with the Registry of this Court within a period of two weeks from date.

10. The petition stands disposed of.

11. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J DECEMBER 03, 2025/vc TD

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top