SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 48184

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S NIIT LTD VS. SFIO


$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 62/2021 KAILASH CHAND UPRETI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Ms. Tanisha Gopal, Advocates versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI P. Buno, P.S. Madhu Vihar Mr. Prateek Saxena, Proxy Counsel for R-2 & 3 CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 02.12.2025

1. Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the impugned Order dated 01.10.2020 in Criminal Revision Petition No. 26/2020 whereby Ld. ASJ upheld the Order dated 06.03.2020 of Ld. MM rejecting the Application under S.156(3) Cr.P.C. for registration of FIR.

2. Briefly stated, the Petitioner had filed a criminal Complaint under Section 200 read with Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’) for the offences under S.323/406/420/467/468/471/120B/506/34 IPC.

3. The Petitioner stated in his Complaint that the Respondent No.2, namely Banti Choudhary @ Narender Singh, was well known to him as they were residing in the same locality. The Petitioner was in search of a flat and discussed it with Respondent No.2, who repr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top