SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 48244

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tejas Karia, J
Karan Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Anil Herbals And Foods Private Limited – Respondent
CS(COMM) 1256/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ankur Sangal, Shashwat Rakshit
For the Respondents: Junaid Alam, Nishant Mahtta, S. Nithin

An ex-parte ad-interim injunction and appointment of a Local Commissioner may be granted in commercial intellectual property disputes where a prima facie case of trade dress infringement and passing off is established, and the balance of convenience favors the plaintiff to prevent irreparable harm to brand goodwill.

Headnote:(A) Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Section 12A - Exemption from pre-institution mediation - Granted where the matter contemplates urgent interim relief. (Para 4)

(B) Trade Mark / Copyright - Infringement, Passing off, Unfair trade practice - Prima facie case established where Defendants adopted a trade dress identical or deceptively similar to Plaintiff's established trade dress for identical products, leading to potential confusion and damage to goodwill. (Paras 31, 32, 33)

Facts of the case:
The Plaintiff claims to be the original owner of a unique trade dress for tobacco products since 2015 and alleges that the Defendants are selling identical products using a deceptively similar trade dress, thereby infringing upon its intellectual property rights and exploiting its brand equity.

Findings of Court:
The Court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 and appointed Local Commissioners to inspect and seize the infringing products, while allowing Defendant Nos. 1 and 4 to file an affidavit denying any involvement or association.

Issues: Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to an ex-parte ad-interim injunction, the appointment of Local Commissioners, and exemption from pre-litigation mediation.

Ratio Decidendi: Upon finding a prima facie case of infringement, likelihood of consumer confusion, and irreparable injury to the Plaintiff's reputation, the Court held that interim relief is necessary to preserve the status quo and prevent further unauthorized exploitation of the Plaintiff’s proprietary trade dress. (Paras 33, 34, 38)

Result: Application for interim injunction and appointment of Local Commissioners allowed; suit registered; summons issued.

Table of Content
1. procedural compliance for exemption and registration in commercial suits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
2. parties' submissions regarding trademark infringement and passing off claims. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
3. prima facie determination of trademark rights and likelihood of confusion. (Para 31 , 32 , 33)
4. granting interim injunction against identified infringing defendants. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
5. appointment of local commissioner to execute seizure and compliance. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)

O R D E R

I.A. No.29347/2025(Exemption)

1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The Application stands disposed of.

I.A. No.29342/2025 (Exemption from pre-institution Mediation)

3. This is an Application filed by the Plaintiff seeking exemption from instituting pre-litigation Mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (“CC Act”).

4. As the present matter contemplates urgent interim relief, in light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Krithi , 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1382, exemption from the requirement of pre-institution Mediation is granted.

5. The Application stands disposed of.

I.A. No.29345/2025 (Exemption from advance service to the Defendants)

6. This is an Application filed by the Plaintiff under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), seeking exemption from advance service to the Defendants.

7. Mr. Ankur Sangal, the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff, submitted that there is a real and imminent likelihood that the Defendants may take immediate steps to dispose of, conceal or suppress its infringing business operations and digital footprints bearing the deceptively similar Trade Mark.

8. In view of the fact that the Plaintiff has sought an urgent ex-parte ad-interim injunction along with the appointment of the Local Commissioners, the exemption from advance service to the Defendants is granted.

9. The Application is disposed of.

I.A. No.29346/2025 (Extension of time to file Court Fees)

10. The present Application has been filed by the Plaintiff under Section 149 read with Section 151 of the CPC, seeking exemption from payment of Court Fees at the time of the filing of the Suit.

11. Considering the submissions made in the present Application, time of two weeks is granted to deposit the Court Fees.

12. The Application stands disposed of.

13. Let the Plaint be registered as a Suit.

14. Issue Summons. The learned Counsel Defendant Nos. 1 and 4 accepts Summons.

15. Let the Summons be served to Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 through all permissible modes upon filing of the Process Fee.

16. The Summons shall state that the Written Statement(s) shall be filed by the Defendants within 30 days from the date of the receipt of Summons. Along with the Written Statement(s), the Defendants shall also file an Affidavit of Admission / Denial of the documents of the Plaintiff, without which the Written Statement(s) shall not be taken on record.

17. Liberty is granted to the Plaintiff to file Replication(s), if any, within 30 days from the receipt of the Written Statement(s). Along with the Replication(s) filed by the Plaintiff, an Affidavit of Admission / Denial of the documents of Defendants be filed by the Plaintiff, without which the Replication(s) shall not be taken on record.

18. In case any Party is placing reliance on a document, which is not in their power and possession, its details and source shall be mentioned in the list of reliance, which shall also be filed with the pleadings.

19. If any of the Parties wish to seek inspection of any documents, the same shall be sought and given within the prescribed timelines.

20. List before the learned Joint Registrar on 21.01.2026 for completion of service and pleadings.

I.A. No.29344/2025 (O-XI R-1(4)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top