SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2644

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRIYANKA AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : 09.02.2026 Pronounced on : 13.02.2026 Uploaded on : 13.02.2026 + FAO 55/2021 PRIYANKA AND ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima and Ms.Megha Sood Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chiranjiv Kumar and Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocates CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

JUDGMENT

CM APPL. 4554/2021 (For condonation of delay of 255 days in filing the appeal)

1. By way of the present application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), the appellants seek condonation of delay of 255 days in filing the present appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that after passing of the judgment/order dated 12.12.2019 (hereinafter referred to as the “impugned judgment”), the appellants could not file the present appeal within the prescribed period. It is submitted that the delay is bona fide and was caused on account of paucity of funds.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, opposes the application.

4. It is noted that a substantial portion of the delay, being approximately 230 days falling

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top