$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 11^th February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 9338/2023 MOHD AMZAD AND ORS.

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nagendra Kasana, Advocate.

versus STATE OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Akshay Dagar. Respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)

1. All the petitioners seeks quashing of FIR No. 206/2019, registered at Police Station Shaheen Bagh for commission of offence under Sections 376/506/34 IPC and Sections 4/6/21 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offence (POCSO) Act, 2012, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on account of amicable settlement between them and respondent No.2.

2. The FIR was registered on the basis of the complaint lodged by respondent No.2 and, according to her, petitioner No.1 had made forcible physical relation with her and when she revealed the abovesaid act of the petitioner No.1 to her relatives, they initially told her that they would arrange marriage between them. According to respondent No.2, thereafter also, there were forcible physical relation by petitioner No.1 on subsequent occasions