SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2733

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
MR ANKIT SINGH PROPREITOR OF FOOTOX FOOTWEAR AND ORS – Respondent


$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI [

Date of Decision: 10.02.2026 + ARB.P. 2058/2025 MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Arunima Sinh Jadaun, Advocate.

versus MR ANKIT SINGH PROPREITOR OF FOOTOX FOOTWEAR AND ORS .....Respondents Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator in terms of the Loan Agreement [“Agreement”] dated 15.07.2023 on the ground that certain disputes have arisen inter se the parties in accordance with Clause 8.2 of the Agreement as between the parties. Clause 8.2 of the Agreement reads as follows:

"8.2. Arbitration: Any disputes, differences, controversies and questions directly or indirectly arising at any time hereafter between the Parties or their respective representatives or assigns, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement or the subject matter of this Agreement), including, without limitation, any question regarding its existence, validity, interpretation, construction, performance, enforcement, rights and liabili

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top