SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2837

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SACHIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent


$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision: 05.02.2026 % LPA 57/2026 & CM APPL. 7966/2026 SACHIN .....Appellant Through: Ms. Vasudha Saini, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chetanya Puri, SPC with Ms.Himani, GP and Ms. Nisha Puri, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 7967/2026 (for exemption

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

LPA 57/2026 & CM APPL. 7966/2026 (for stay

3. This Letters Patent Appeal questions the validity of an order dated 24.12.2025 passed by learned Single Judge in CONT.CAS.(C) 1994/2025 instituted by the appellant, whereby the Contempt Petition has been disposed of by observing that in the facts of the case no willful disobedience is made out.

4. On a query by the Court as to how the instant Letters Patent Appeal shall be maintainable in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Midnapore Peoples’ Coop. Bank Ltd. v. Chunilal Nanda, 2006 (5) SCC 399, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the instant Letters Patent Appeal will be maintainable in view of observation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top