$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (COMM) 318/2025 M/S AWADH OILS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajul Shrivastav and Ms.

Nayan Gupta, Advs.

versus SHRI KAUSHAL GOYAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Tanzeela Farheen and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advs. CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL)

% 03.02.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

1. The appellant instituted CS (Comm) 422/2025, “the suit” hereinafter against the respondent before the learned District Judge (Commercial Court)-02, “the learned Commercial Court” hereinafter North-West District, Rohini, alleging that the respondents were using trade marks of which “KALA GHODA” was the sole or the prominent part for mustard oil, edible oils and allied products, and were, thereby, passing off their goods as those of the appellant.

2. The appellant has no registration, under Section 23 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, “the Act” hereinafter, for the mark KALA GHODA, whether in word or device form. The respondent, on the other hand, is the proprietor of registrations of the mark KALA GHODA, though the appellant has filed applications for remo