SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2969

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER – Appellant
Versus
M/S. APRA AUTO (INDIA) PVT. LTD. – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 22.01.2026 + W.P.(C) 3824/2022 THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Braja Bandhu Pradhan, Advocate.

versus M/S. APRA AUTO (INDIA) PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed seeking setting aside of the order dated 08.04.2021 passed by the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labor Court-II, Rouse Avenue, Delhi (hereinafter “the Tribunal”) whereby, while appreciating the appeal, the order passed under Section 14B of The Employees’ Provident Funds And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter “the EPF and MP Act”) was set aside.

2. Notably, despite being served, the respondent did not appear in the underlying proceedings before RPFC Gurgaon and was proceeded ex parte on 05.05.2015. Even in the present proceedings, efforts to serve the respondent remained futile and substituted service was directed. The necessary publications were carried out, and an affidavit of service was also filed.

3. The petitioner has claimed that initially, the concerned officer had passed an orde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top