WP(C) 4619/2003 Page 1 of 9

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of decision: 9^th August, 2010

+

W.P.(C) 4619/2003

DR.JAIPAL & ANR.

..... Petitioners

Through Mr.Arvind Gupta with

Mr.Bipin Singhvi and Mr.Ankit

Chaudhary, Advocates

versus

GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents

Through Ms.Meera Bhatia, Adv. for GNCTD

Mr.Ashok Mahajan, Adv. for R-3.

Mr.T.K. Joseph, Adv. for R-4

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

1.Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

2.To be referred to the Reporter or not?

Yes

3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Yes

DIPAK MISRA, CJ

By this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India, the petitioner has prayed for declaring Section 17(5) of the

Delhi Bhartiya Chikitsa Parishad Act, 1998 (for short „the 1998 Act‟) as

ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(e), 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of

India and Sections