$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 256/2019 SHAILESH KANT SHARMA ....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Avani Sharma, Mr. Suryansh Vashisth, Mr. Krishna Upreti, Advocates versus SHISHIR KANT SHARMA & ANR ......Defendants Through: Mr. Rohit Singha, Advocate CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

O R D E R

% 02.02.2026 I.A. 683/2026

1. This application has been filed on behalf of the Applicants/Legal Heirs of the deceased Plaintiff seeking condonation of delay of 59 days in filing the application under Order XXII Rule 3 of the CPC.

2. The instant suit was filed by the Plaintiff seeking partition, declaration, injunction and rendition of accounts in respect of the property bearing House No.5, Priya Enclave, Karkardooma, New Delhi-110092 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘suit property’).

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts as stated in the Plaint are that the Plaintiff and the Defendants are siblings, and sons of Late Rajni Kant Sharma and Late Shyama Sharma. The family is governed by the Mitakshara school of Hindu Law. It is stated in the plaint that the suit property was the self-acquired property of Late Rajni Kant Sharma and had been allotted to him in the year 198