SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 3187

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEETU MEENA AND ORS VS. INDIRA GANDHI DELHI TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN AND ORS


$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7880/2018 ASHUTOSH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Mr. Yatharth Singh and Ms. Shrishti Gautam, Advocates.

versus NATIONALS SCHEDULED CASTES FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Sinha, Mr. Md. Ghulam Akbar, Mr. Jeemon Raju K. & Ms.

Suman Lata, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 03.02.2026

1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution assails the decision of National Scheduled Castes Finance and Development Corporation (NSFDC or “the Corporation”) of not selecting the Petitioner to the post of Manager (Information Technology), pursuant to the recruitment process initiated through the vacancy notification published in Employment News dated 19th August, 2017 to 25th August, 2017. The Petitioner seeks, in substance, a direction to set aside the decision of non-selection and to appoint him to the said post.

Facts in brief

2. The vacancy notification advertised, inter alia, one post of Manager (IT) in the E-3 level (Group ‘A’) in the middle managerial cadre of the Corporation. The “Mode of Selection” clause stipulated that selection to the po

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top