SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 3288

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MS. HEMA D'SOUZA NEE MEHTA VS. SH. VISHAL MEHTA


$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 270/2023 & I.A. 8592/2023, I.A. 8684/2024 MITHUN DAS .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Sugandha Anand and Mr.

Surinder Anand, Advs.

versus ARVIND PANI & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma and Ms.

Mansi, Advs for Defendant Nos. 1 and 3.

Ms. Rupali Samuel, Ms. Aditi Soni, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

O R D E R

% 04.02.2026 I.A. 8683/2024

1. The present application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [“CPC”], has been filed on behalf of the Defendants No.1 to 5 for rejection of the Plaint.

2. The present Suit is one for damages, injunction, and compensation for alleged defamation and malicious prosecution.

3. Facts, in brief, leading to the filing of the present Suit are as under:

a. It is stated that the Plaintiff is a Mechanical Engineer, who joined the Defendant No.5/Company on 23.10.2017 as the Vice-President (Government Relations). The Defendants No.1 to 4 are the key position holders in Defendant No.5/Company.

b. In 2019, the Plaintiff was promoted to the position of Chief Revenue Officer with effect from 01.04.2019, where he handled end-to-end business responsibilities inclu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top