SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 3475

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
OMNIDYA TECH LLP VS. M/S NAYAN INDIA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD
CS(COMM) 1439/2025



$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1439/2025 MADHAV KRG LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Surinder Singh, Advocate.

versus SATINDER KAUR AND ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Rahul Gupta, Ms. Deepti Gupta, Mr. Anshul Garg and Ms. Sakshi, Advocates for R-1.

Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Akash Mishra, Mr. Arnav Mittal, Ms. Nikita Singh and Mr. Om Ram, Advocates for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

% 05.02.2026

1. The Registry is directed to number all the applications, pending or disposed of, so far as the present Suit is concerned.

I.A. (Seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement)

2. This is an application filed on behalf of the defendant nos.1 and 2 seeking condonation of delay of 16 days in filing the written statement beyond 30 days period as stipulated in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

3. Issue notice.

4. Notice is accepted by Mr. Surinder Singh, learned counsel for the plaintiff who has no objection in case the application is allowed.

5. Accordingly, the application stands allowed. The delay of 16 days in filing the written statement over and above 30 days period is condoned.

6. The written statement be taken on record.

learned counsel for the defendants.

8. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within four weeks thereafter.

9. Application stands disposed of.

I.A. (Seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement)

10. This is an application filed on behalf of the defendant no.3 seeking condonation of delay of 15 days in filing the written statement beyond 30 days period as stipulated in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

11. Issue notice.

12. Notice is accepted by Mr. Surinder Singh, learned counsel for the plaintiff who has no objection in case the application is allowed.

13. Accordingly, the application stands allowed. The delay of 15 days in filing the written statement over and above 30 days period is condoned.

14. The written statement be taken on record.

15. Learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks and is granted four weeks’ time to file the replication as per the Rules with an advance copy to be furnished to the learned counsel for the defendants.

16. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within four weeks thereafter.

17. Application stands disposed of.

I.A. & I.A (Under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section

151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908)

18. These are applications filed on behalf of defendant nos. 1 and 2 on one hand and defendant no.3 on the other, under Order VII Rule 11(d) read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking rejection of the plaint.

19. Issue notice.

20. Notice is accepted by Mr. Surinder Singh, learned counsel for the plaintiff.

defendants. Rejoinder thereto, be filed within four weeks thereafter.

22. In case there are any applications, where the pleadings are to be completed, the parties are at liberty to file their responses before the next date of hearing.

23. List before the Joint Registrar (Judicial) on 16.04.2026.

24. List before this Court on 29.07.2026.

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J FEBRUARY 5, 2026 Sumit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top