SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 3689

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VINITA RANI VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8348/2025 and CM APPL. 36187/2025 HDFC SECURITIES LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Jayant Mehta, Sr. Adv with Mr.

Sameer Pandit, Mr. Aman Raj Gandhi, Ms.Sara Khambati, Mr. Parthasarathy Bose, and Ms. Lavina Bhargava, Advs.

versus ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY PMLA NEW DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel and Mr. Kanishk Maurya, Adv.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

O R D E R

% 09.02.2026

1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 08.05.2025, passed by the respondent no.1, whereby, the provisional attachment order has been confirmed.

2. Mr. Jayant Mehta, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, raised various grievances, including to state that there is a flagrant violation of the first proviso to sub-Section 2 of Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter ‘the PMLA’), which violates principle of natural justice. It is submitted that the petitioner is a Securities and Exchange Board of India (‘SEBI’)-Registered Stock Broking Company. It provides a margin trading facility. According to him, had the petitioner been heard by the adjudicating auth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top