IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PAWAN KUMAR VS. INDIAN BANK
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1406/2025 & CM APPL. 6826/2025 DR. SHIBLI JAMEEL AHMAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Adit S. Pujari, Ms. Nehal Siddiqui, Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat and Mr. Harshwardhan Pushkin Sharma, Advocates.
versus JAMIA HAMDARD .....Respondent Through: Dr. Swaroop George, Mr. Mobashshir Sarwar, Mr. Abhinandan Jain, Mr. Shivam Prajapati, Mr. Abhigyan Dwivedi, Mr. Kartikey and Mr.
Takrim Ahsan Khan, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 10.02.2026
1. This writ petition raises a narrow question with wide consequences: whether an employee of Jamia Hamdard (Deemed University) who, in September 1996, opted to continue under the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) regime can, nearly three decades later, demand a mandatory shift to the General Provident Fund (GPF) with pension by invoking the Government of India Office Memoranda dated 1st May, 1987. The relief sought is a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to “forthwith convert” the Petitioner’s CPF account into a GPF account, with all consequential pensionary benefits.
Facts in brief:
2. The Petitioner, Dr. Shibli Jameel Ahmad, serves as a faculty member of the Respond
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.