SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 3786

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PAWAN KUMAR VS. INDIAN BANK


$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1406/2025 & CM APPL. 6826/2025 DR. SHIBLI JAMEEL AHMAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Adit S. Pujari, Ms. Nehal Siddiqui, Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat and Mr. Harshwardhan Pushkin Sharma, Advocates.

versus JAMIA HAMDARD .....Respondent Through: Dr. Swaroop George, Mr. Mobashshir Sarwar, Mr. Abhinandan Jain, Mr. Shivam Prajapati, Mr. Abhigyan Dwivedi, Mr. Kartikey and Mr.

Takrim Ahsan Khan, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 10.02.2026

1. This writ petition raises a narrow question with wide consequences: whether an employee of Jamia Hamdard (Deemed University) who, in September 1996, opted to continue under the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) regime can, nearly three decades later, demand a mandatory shift to the General Provident Fund (GPF) with pension by invoking the Government of India Office Memoranda dated 1st May, 1987. The relief sought is a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to “forthwith convert” the Petitioner’s CPF account into a GPF account, with all consequential pensionary benefits.

Facts in brief:

2. The Petitioner, Dr. Shibli Jameel Ahmad, serves as a faculty member of the Respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top