$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 138/2026, CM APPL. 9394/2026, 9395/2026 & 9396/2026 VIPIN SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ishan Sanghi Ms. Poorvashi Kalra, Advocates.

versus SH. JAGROOP SHARMA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: None CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 11.02.2026

1. Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as, “CPC”) has been filed on behalf of the Appellant against the Order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the Ld. District Judge-03, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, whereby, Suit of the Plaintiff/Appellant for Declaration, Partition and Permanent Injunction was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, by holding that the Suit was barred by law and disclosed no cause of action.

2. Briefly stated, CS No. 726/2019 for Declaration, Partition and Permanent Injunction was filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff. The facts are that Respondent No.1, Mr. Jagroop Sharma, is the father of the Appellant, Mr. Vipin Sharma, Respondent No. 2, Ms. Sheela, is his stepmother, and Respondent No. 3, Ms. Preeti, is his stepsister. Respondent No. 1, had married Ms. Geeta Sharma, mother of the App