SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 3986

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
LUXUS RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED VS. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI


$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3877/2025, CRL.M.A. 35042/2025 ASHWANI KAPOOR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Devyanani Sharma and Mr. Sahil Giri, Advocate.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Advocate for Mr.

Amol Sinha, ASC for the State.

SI Chetan, P.S.: Paschim Vihar West.

Ms. Devyaani Sharma, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 12.02.2026 By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 1382/2023 dated 29.12.2023 registered under sections 285/304-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) at P.S.: Paschim Vihar West, Delhi.

2. Further to what was recorded in order dated 29.01.2026, Mr. Kshitiz Garg, learned counsel appearing for Mr. Amol Sinha, learned ASC for the State submits, that as per their calculation, and considering the age of the deceased and his monthly wages as an unskilled worker, as well as the parameters under the Employee’s Compensation Act 1923 (‘EC Act’), the compensation that the deceased would be entitled to receive unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top