$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 927/2025 KAMAL SANGWAN .....Appellant Through: Ms. Mary Vimala Bai, Advocate.

versus ANUPAMA JAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Verma, Ms. Somya Chugh and Mr. Vivek Mathur, Advocates. CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 12.02.2026

1. Regular first appeal under Section 96 CPC has been filed to challenge the Judgment and Decree dated 26.04.2025, whereby the Suit of the Appellant filed for Recovery of Rs. 4,71,350/- has been partly decreed in the sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- along with the interest of 6% per annum with effect from 04.03.2022 till the date of realization.

2. The Plaintiff/Respondent herein had filed a Suit for Recovery of Rs.3,89,139/- against the Defendants. The facts as narrated in the plaint were that Defendant/Appellant was the family friend of the Plaintiff and they were known to each other since 2018. The Defendant borrowed money from the Plaintiff, as under:

3. The Defendant returned a total of Rs.1 ,00,000/- till 11.02.2021 in the Bank account of the Plaintiff‟s Hus