$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1953/2026, CM APPL. 9459/2026 & CM APPL. 9460/2026 SUNITA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Thakur, Mr. Rishi Raj, Mr.

Sujeet Kumar, and Mr. Ningthem Oinam, Advocates.

Petitioner-in-person.

versus BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED (BRPL) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sharique Hussain, Advocate for R-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 13.02.2026 CM APPL. 9460/2026 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 1953/2026

2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking set aside of the order dated14^thJanuary2026,passedbythe ConsumerGrievance RedressalForum (CGRF) in CG No.184/2025, rejecting the complaint filed by the petitioner.

3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/BSES on advance notice submits that the aforesaid order passed by the CGRF is appealable under Section 42(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter ‘Act’).

4. For the ease of reference, Section 42(6) of the Act is set out below:

“Section 42. (Duties of distribution licensee and open access):

…

(6) Any consumer, who is aggrieved by non-redressal of his grievances under sub-section (5), may make a representation for the redressal