SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4110

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD VS. MOHALI TRADERS AND ORS


$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 287/2026, I.A. 4028/2026 & I.A. 4029/2026 RAJESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mithilesh Jha, Adv.

versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Madhu Sweta, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

O R D E R

% 13.02.2026

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator, in respect of the disputes arising out of the Contract Agreement dated 04th August, 2025 between the parties, whereby, the petitioner herein was engaged for collection of User Fees at Banaundi Fee Plaza, amongst other services.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent had invited bids for the aforementioned purpose by falsely misrepresenting the Annual Potential Collection (“APC”) of the Fee Plaza in question to be Rs. 19.53 Crores, translating into Rs. 5,35,000/- as dailyremittance.

3. The Contract Agreement 04th August, 2025 had been executed between the parties pursuant to a Letter of Award dated 30th July, 2025, by way of which,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top