SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4120

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PVT LTD VS. N P REFOILS AND PROTEINS
CS(COMM) 142/2026



$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 142/2026 SAREGAMA INDIA LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Ankur Sangal, Mr. Ankit Arvind, Mr. Bhuvan Malhotra, Mr. Shashwat Rakshit and Ms. Annanya Mehan, Advocates.

versus GLOBAL MUSIC JUNCTION PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

.....Defendants Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Yashvardhan, Mr. Devesh Mohan, Mr. Gyanendra Shukla, Mr. Pranav Das, Ms. Ridhie Bajaj and Mr. Happy Parashar, Advocates for D-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

% 13.02.2026 I.A. 4101/2026 (Pre-institution Mediation)

1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff seeking exemption from instituting pre-litigation mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CC Act’) read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’).

2. As the present matter contemplates urgent interim relief, in light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Yamini Manohar vs. T.K.D. Keerthi: (2024) 5 SCC 815, exemption from the requirement of pre-institution mediation is granted.

3. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 4102/2026 (Additional Documents

4. The present application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order XI Rule 1(4) of the CPC as applicable to commercial suits under the CC Act seeking leave to place on record additional documents.

5. The plaintiff is permitted to file additional documents in accordance with the provisions of the CC Act and the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018.

6. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

I.A. 4103/2026 (Seeking Extension of time to file Court fees)

7. The present application has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 149 read with Section 151 of CPC, seeking extension of time for payment of court fees.

8. Considering the submissions made in the present application, an extension of two weeks is granted to affix the requisite court fees.

9. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 4104/2026 (Exemption from Filing Original/Certified copies)

10. This is an application filed under Section 151 of CPC on behalf of plaintiff seeking exemption from filing original/certified, unhighlighted, typed translated from vernacular, illegible copies of documents.

11. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. However, the original/certified, unhighlighted, typed translated from vernacular, illegible copies of documents be filed within two weeks with an advance copy to the defendants.

12. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 4105/2026 (Exemption from Filing Redacted Documents)

13. This is an application filed under Section 151 of CPC on behalf of plaintiff seeking exemption from filing redacted documents having commercial sensitive terms.

14. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. However, redacted documents having commercial sensitive terms be filed within two weeks with an advance copy to the defendants.

15. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 4100/2026(Stay)

16. Present application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of CPC, 1908 seeking ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the defendants.

17. Issue notice.

18. Mr. Yashvardhan, learned counsel enter appearance on behalf of defendant no.1 and accepts notice.

19. Notice be served upon the defendant no.2 by all permissible modes upon the plaintiff taking steps within one week, dasti in addition.

20. Heard substantial arguments of Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Counsel appearing for the plaintiff and Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Counsel appearing for the defendant no.1.

21. Having considered the various aspects and also perusing the agreement stated to be executed between the plaintiff and defendant no.2, as also the agreement entered into between defendant no.1 and defendant no.2, this Court is of the considered opinion that the presence of defendant no.2, who is a common denominator between the plaintiff on o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top