IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RUDRA PRATAP YADAV VS. THE SECRETARY(MHRD) AND ORS
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8212/2018, CM APPL. 13924/2023 KALYAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.
versus LD. DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, HQ DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC for GNCTD Services with Mr. N.K.
Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 16.02.2026
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution questions only the effective date of the Petitioner’s promotion to the post of Judicial Assistant (Group ‘C’, Non-Gazetted). The Petitioner does not dispute that promotion has been granted. The dispute is about whether the notional promotion could, or should, be antedated to 18th December, 2008 (the date on which the Petitioner claims eligibility matured), instead of 1st July, 2012 (the date from which the promotion order extends effect).
Facts
2. The Petitioner joined the Respondent establishment on 18th December, 2003 as Junior Judicial Assistant. As per the Petitioner, the next promotion to Judicial Assistant became due on completion of the prescribed residency period, and therefore fell due on 18th December, 2008.
3. Promotion in the cadr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.