SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4177

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RUDRA PRATAP YADAV VS. THE SECRETARY(MHRD) AND ORS


$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8212/2018, CM APPL. 13924/2023 KALYAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.

versus LD. DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, HQ DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC for GNCTD Services with Mr. N.K.

Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 16.02.2026

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution questions only the effective date of the Petitioner’s promotion to the post of Judicial Assistant (Group ‘C’, Non-Gazetted). The Petitioner does not dispute that promotion has been granted. The dispute is about whether the notional promotion could, or should, be antedated to 18th December, 2008 (the date on which the Petitioner claims eligibility matured), instead of 1st July, 2012 (the date from which the promotion order extends effect).

Facts

2. The Petitioner joined the Respondent establishment on 18th December, 2003 as Junior Judicial Assistant. As per the Petitioner, the next promotion to Judicial Assistant became due on completion of the prescribed residency period, and therefore fell due on 18th December, 2008.

3. Promotion in the cadr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top