$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 121/2023, CC 6/2023 & I.A. 17292/2023 SH. PANKAJ SAWHNEY .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. M.S. Khan, Ms. Neha Khan, Mr.

Akbar Kaleem and Ms. Shaziya, Advs. versus SMT. SUMAN SAWHNEY AND OTHERS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Rajeev Verma, Adv. for Adv. for D-1 to D-4.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 16.02.2026 I.A. 44210/2024 (under Order XL Rule 1 read with Order XX Rule XVIII CPC by plaintiff)

1. Mr. M.S. Khan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of plaintiff/applicant invites attention of the Court to the order dated 09.04.2024 to contend that vide said order the preliminary decree was passed to the effect that the plaintiff and defendants are entitled to an undivided 50% share each in property no. 7726-28, Ward No.XV, Gopal Bhavan, Ram Nagar, Paharganj, Delhi-110055.

2. He submits that Local Commissioner may be appointed to visit the property and submit his report as to whether the property can be divided by metes and bounds.

3. Since, it is not in dispute that the preliminary decree passed by this Court vide order dated 09.04.2024 has not been challenged by the defendants and has attained finality, Mr. Siddhartha S