$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 168/2022 JEET SINGH @ AJEET SINGH .....Plaintiff Through: Mr Aakash Sehrawat, Adv.

versus SAMEY SINGH .....Defendant Through: Mr. Jayant Tewathia, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

O R D E R

% 17.02.2026 I.A. 4335/2026

1. The present joint Application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the CPC has been filed on behalf of the Plaintiff and the Defendant, for recording the settlement arrived between the parties in terms of the Compromise Deed dated 10.02.2026.

2. The instant Suit has been filed with the following prayers:-

“(i) Pass a Preliminary Decree of Partition in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant in respect of the Suit Property i.e. plot bearing No. 29, situated in Block-C in Nangal Dewat, Village Rangpuri, New Delhi, admeasuring 550 sq. mtrs.

(ii) Appoint a Local Commissioner to define the mode of partition of the suit property and pass a Final Decree of partition of the suit property and put the parties in possession of their respective shares.

(iii) In case the suit property cannot be divided/ partitioned by metes and bounds due to its nature or any special circumstances then this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased direct the sale of the suit property and distribute the sale proceeds equally between the plaintiff and defendant.

(iv) Pass a decree of Permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant, directing the defendant to not to create any third party rights in the suit property and also restrain the defendant to not raise any unauthorized construction over the suit property.

iv. Award the cost(s) of the suit in favour of the Plaintiff and again the defendant.”

3. The Suit is in relation to the property being Plot No.29, Block-C, Nangal Dewat, Village Rangpuri, New Delhi admeasuring 550 sq. meters.

[“Suit Property”]. The disputes are primarily between the brothers.

4. During the pendency of the Suit, the brothers decided to bury all their differences for which a Compromise Deed dated 10.02.2026 was entered into, which has been filed along with the present Application.

5. The Compromise Deed dated 10.02.2026 reads as under:-

6. Paragraph No.5 of the Compromise Deed indicates the manner in which the Suit Property has been divided.

7. The instant Application has also been signed by the Plaintiff and the Defendant and is accompanied by their respective affidavits.

8. The Plaintiff and the Defendant are present in Court today and state that they have read and understood the contents of the Compromise Deed. It is also stated that the Compromise Deed has been entered into without any coercion or under influence.

9. This Court has also perused the Compromise Deed and is of the opinion that the same is lawful in nature and is capable of being accepted under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC.

10. The Compromise Deed is taken on record.

11. The Parties are bound by the terms contained in the Compromise Deed.

12. It is made clear that any violation of the Compromise Deed would be construed as a violation of an undertaking given to the Court.

13. The Suit is disposed of under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC in terms of the Compromise Deed dated 10.02.2026, along with pending application(s), if any.

14. Let a decree sheet be drawn up according to the Compromise Deed dated 10.02.2026.

15. Since the parties have entered into a compromise, let the entire court fee be refunded to the Plaintiff in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.

16. The Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J FEBRUARY 17, 2026 Prateek