$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 85/2025 SIS CASH SERVICES LTD. .....Appellant Through: Ms. Rima Majumdar, Mr. Kashish Vij, Ms. Anukriti Banerjee, Mr. Vikrant Rana and Mrs. Bindra Rana, Advocates.

versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Barathi, SPC with Mr. Arnav Mittal and Ms. Rasya Rawal, Advocates for UoI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

O R D E R

% 17.02.2026

1. This appeal is filed under Section 91 of The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (‘1999 Act’) challenging impugned order dated 19.09.2025 passed by the Respondent as also for a direction to the Respondent to accept and advertise Appellant’s Trade Mark Application No. 696714 dated 18.04.2025 in Class

36 for the mark ‘myRupee@home’ in the Trade Mark Journal.

2. To the extent necessary, the facts are that Appellant submitted a Trademark Application No. 696714 dated 18.04.2025 for the mark ‘myRupee@home’ in Class 36 on a ‘proposed to be used’ basis. The mark was examined by the Respondent and Examination Report (‘ER’) was issued on 29.04.2025, wherein objections were raised under Sections 9(1)(a) and 11(1) of 1999 Act. Conflicting mark ‘MYRUPEES.COM/ ’ was cited in the ER.