$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 149/2026 & I.A. 4425/2026, I.A. 4426/2026, I.A. 4427/2026, I.A. 4428/2026, I.A. 4429/2026 GLORIOUS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ORS. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. T. Singh Dev, Mr. Sarang S Chowdhry and Mr. Shashank S Chowdhry, Advs.

versus THE REGISTRAR (FIRMS AND SOCIETIES) & ORS.

.....Defendants Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

O R D E R

% 17.02.2026

1. The present Suit has been filed with the following prayers:-

“a. Declare that the Governing Body, having Plaintiff No. 2 as Chairman and Plaintiff No. 3 as Treasurer, is the genuine Governing Body of Plaintiff No. 1, and any actions taken by the fraudulent Governing Body constituted by Defendant Nos. 4 to 12 be declared null and void; and b. Declare that the School Management Committee, formed by Plaintiff No. 1, having Plaintiff No. 2 as Chairman and Plaintiff No. 3 as Treasurer, is the genuine School Management Committee of the School, and any actions taken by the fraudulent management committee be declared null and void; and c. Pass an order of declaration declaring the appointment of Defendant No. 4 as the Principal of the school as fraudulent, unlawful, and void ab initio; and d. Grant a mandatory injunction restraining Defendants No. 4 to 12 from undertaking any actions, representations, or decisions on behalf of the Plaintiff Society or the school in any manner whatsoever; and e. Grant a mandatory injunction restraining Defendants No. 4 to 12 from creating any third-party interest in the Plaintiff Society or the school, either directly or indirectly, through agreements, leases, assignments, or any other form of transaction; and f. Grant a Permanent Injunction restraining Defendant Nos. 4 to 12 from entering the premises of the school and interfering in the management, administration, or day-to-day functioning of the school; and g. Grant a Mandatory Injunction directing Defendant Nos. 4 to 12 to cease and desist from their fraudulent acts, including but not limited to interfering in the school’s operations and misappropriating funds of the School and Plaintiff Society; and h. Grant a Mandatory Injunction restraining Defendant No. 1 from admitting or considering any new documents or submissions made on behalf of the fraudulent parallel Governing Body of the Plaintiff Society, constituted by Defendant Nos. 4 to 12, and further direct Defendant No. 1 to take no cognizance of any such unauthorized or fraudulent actions purportedly undertaken by the said fraudulent Governing Body; and i. Pass a decree directing Defendant Nos. 4 to 12 to render true, complete, and proper accounts of all funds, revenues, receipts, expenditures, and financial dealings of the School and the Plaintiff Society during the period of their fraudulent and unauthorized control, including but not limited to school fees, salaries, cash collections, income from shops, academies, and other commercial activities; and j. Pass a decree in favour of the Plaintiffs and against Defendant Nos. 4 to 12 for a sum of ₹2,20,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores Twenty Lakhs Only), being the minimum amount presently ascertained as misappropriated, along with interest at such rate as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit from the date of misappropriation till realisation ; and k. Pass any other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interests of justice, equity, and fairness.”

2. The averments made in the plaint are that a Lease Deed dated 12.04.1997, was executed by the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as “DDA”) in favour of the Plaintiff for the purpose of running a school. It is the case of the Plaintiffs that the family of the Plaintiffs invested a sum of Rs. 1,11,50,488/- for establishing and developing the school under the name of Glorious Public School, Sector 9, Rohini, New Delhi, which came into existence.

3. It is stated that in the year 2008, the Plaintiff No.2 and her younger sister, Late Ms. Unmukta Aggarwal were appoi